diff --git a/archetypes/post-bundle/index.md b/archetypes/post-bundle/index.md
index 0b9ca8e..d9b01e9 100644
--- a/archetypes/post-bundle/index.md
+++ b/archetypes/post-bundle/index.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ author:
 description:
 keywords:
 license:
-comment: false
+comment: true
 weight: 0
 tags:
   - draft
diff --git a/archetypes/posts.md b/archetypes/posts.md
index c1f55bd..c7d53f7 100644
--- a/archetypes/posts.md
+++ b/archetypes/posts.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ author:
 description:
 keywords:
 license:
-comment: false
+comment: true
 weight: 0
 tags:
   - draft
diff --git a/content/en/posts/csci-1100/exam-2-overview/index.md b/content/en/posts/csci-1100/exam-2-overview/index.md
index af3e2f3..278de43 100644
--- a/content/en/posts/csci-1100/exam-2-overview/index.md
+++ b/content/en/posts/csci-1100/exam-2-overview/index.md
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ comment: true
 weight: 0
 tags:
   - CSCI 1100
-  - Homework
+  - Exam
   - RPI
   - Python
   - Programming
diff --git a/content/en/posts/llama-cpp/compare-quantization-type/index.md b/content/en/posts/llama-cpp/compare-quantization-type/index.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..91f1b71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/en/posts/llama-cpp/compare-quantization-type/index.md
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+---
+title: Choice an Ideal Quantization Type for llama.cpp
+subtitle:
+date: 2024-03-15T19:43:54-04:00
+slug: quantization-type-llama-cpp
+draft: false
+author:
+  name: James
+  link: https://www.jamesflare.com
+  email:
+  avatar: /site-logo.avif
+description: This blog post compares different quantization types in llama.cpp, analyzing their impact on model size and perplexity. It provides recommendations for choosing the best quantization type based on the balance between quality and performance.
+keywords: ["llama.cpp", "quantization", "model compression", "perplexity"]
+license:
+comment: true
+weight: 0
+tags:
+  - LLM
+  - llama.cpp
+  - Quantization
+  - Ollama
+categories:
+  - LLM
+collections:
+  - Ollama
+hiddenFromHomePage: false
+hiddenFromSearch: false
+hiddenFromRss: false
+hiddenFromRelated: false
+summary: This blog post compares different quantization types in llama.cpp, analyzing their impact on model size and perplexity. It provides recommendations for choosing the best quantization type based on the balance between quality and performance.
+resources:
+  - name: featured-image
+    src: featured-image.jpg
+  - name: featured-image-preview
+    src: featured-image-preview.jpg
+toc: true
+math: false
+lightgallery: false
+password:
+message:
+repost:
+  enable: true
+  url:
+
+# See details front matter: https://fixit.lruihao.cn/documentation/content-management/introduction/#front-matter
+---
+
+<!--more-->
+
+When we deploy llama.cpp or Ollama instances, we prefer to run a quantized model to save memory and speed up inference.
+
+But the quality of the quantized model is not always good. We need to choose a proper quantization type to balance the quality and the performance. 
+
+## Quantization Type in llama.cpp
+
+There are many quantization types in llama.cpp. You can see this print when you try to quantize a model.
+
+```text
+Allowed quantization types:
+   2  or  Q4_0    :  3.56G, +0.2166 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   3  or  Q4_1    :  3.90G, +0.1585 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   8  or  Q5_0    :  4.33G, +0.0683 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   9  or  Q5_1    :  4.70G, +0.0349 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  19  or  IQ2_XXS :  2.06 bpw quantization
+  20  or  IQ2_XS  :  2.31 bpw quantization
+  24  or  IQ1_S   :  1.56 bpw quantization
+  10  or  Q2_K    :  2.63G, +0.6717 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  21  or  Q2_K_S  :  2.16G, +9.0634 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  23  or  IQ3_XXS :  3.06 bpw quantization
+  26  or  IQ3_S   :  3.44 bpw quantization
+  27  or  IQ3_M   :  3.66 bpw quantization mix
+  12  or  Q3_K    : alias for Q3_K_M
+  22  or  Q3_K_XS : 3-bit extra small quantization
+  11  or  Q3_K_S  :  2.75G, +0.5551 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  12  or  Q3_K_M  :  3.07G, +0.2496 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  13  or  Q3_K_L  :  3.35G, +0.1764 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  25  or  IQ4_NL  :  4.25 bpw non-linear quantization
+  15  or  Q4_K    : alias for Q4_K_M
+  14  or  Q4_K_S  :  3.59G, +0.0992 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  15  or  Q4_K_M  :  3.80G, +0.0532 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  17  or  Q5_K    : alias for Q5_K_M
+  16  or  Q5_K_S  :  4.33G, +0.0400 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  17  or  Q5_K_M  :  4.45G, +0.0122 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  18  or  Q6_K    :  5.15G, +0.0008 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   7  or  Q8_0    :  6.70G, +0.0004 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   1  or  F16     : 13.00G              @ 7B
+   0  or  F32     : 26.00G              @ 7B
+          COPY    : only copy tensors, no quantizing
+```
+
+## Quantization Type Comparison
+
+To help us compare the quantization types, I made a table to show the size and ppl (Perplexity) change of each quantization type. Smaller ppl change means better quality. Perplexity generally measures the confidence of the model predict result. The lower the perplexity, the better the model.
+
+| Q Type | Size | ppl Change | Note |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| Q2\_K\_S | 2.16G | +9.0634 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q2\_K | 2.63G | +0.6717 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q3\_K\_S | 2.75G | +0.5551 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q3\_K | - | - | alias for Q3\_K\_M |
+| Q3\_K\_M | 3.07G | +0.2496 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q3\_K\_L | 3.35G | +0.1764 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q4\_0 | 3.56G | +0.2166 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q4\_K\_S | 3.59G | +0.0992 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q4\_K | - | - | alias for Q4\_K\_M |
+| Q4\_K\_M | 3.80G | +0.0532 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q4\_1 | 3.90G | +0.1585 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q5\_0 | 4.33G | +0.0683 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q5\_K\_S | 4.33G | +0.0400 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q5\_1 | 4.70G | +0.0349 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q5\_K | - | - | alias for Q5\_K\_M |
+| Q5\_K\_M | 4.45G | +0.0122 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q6\_K | 5.15G | +0.0008 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q8\_0 | 6.70G | +0.0004 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+
+To help us understand the relationship between size and ppl change, I made a scatter plot to show the relationship.
+
+{{< echarts >}}
+{
+  "title": {
+    "text": "ppl Change vs Size",
+    "top": "2%",
+    "left": "center"
+  },
+  "xAxis": {
+    "name": "Size (GB)",
+    "nameLocation": "middle",
+    "nameGap": 30
+  },
+  "yAxis": {
+    "name": "ppl Change",
+    "nameLocation": "middle",
+    "nameGap": 40
+  },
+  "series": [
+    {
+      "symbolSize": 10,
+      "data": [
+        {
+          "name": "Q2_K",
+          "value": [2.63, 0.6717]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q3_K_S",
+          "value": [2.75, 0.5551]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q3_K_M",
+          "value": [3.07, 0.2496]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q3_K_L",
+          "value": [3.35, 0.1764]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q4_0",
+          "value": [3.56, 0.2166]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q4_K_S",
+          "value": [3.59, 0.0992]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q4_K_M",
+          "value": [3.80, 0.0532]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q4_1",
+          "value": [3.90, 0.1585]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q5_0",
+          "value": [4.33, 0.0683]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q5_K_S",
+          "value": [4.33, 0.0400]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q5_1",
+          "value": [4.70, 0.0349]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q5_K_M",
+          "value": [4.45, 0.0122]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q6_K",
+          "value": [5.15, 0.0008]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q8_0",
+          "value": [6.70, 0.0004]
+        }
+      ],
+      "type": "scatter"
+    }
+  ],
+  "tooltip": {
+    "trigger": "item",
+    "formatter": "Q Type: {b}<br/>Data: {c}"
+  }
+}
+{{< /echarts >}}
+
+## Summary
+
+From the table and the scatter plot, we can see that Q8\_0 has the best quality, but the size is the largest. Q2\_K\_S has the worst quality, but the size is the smallest. Q4\_K\_M has the best balance between quality and size. But I recommend Q5\_K\_M, which has a good quality and a reasonable size.
+
+For small model, like 7B, 14B. I recommend Q6\_K, even it's larger than Q5\_K\_M, but the ppl change is extremely small. For GPU like RTX 4090, 24GB VRAM is more than enough. But for GPU, other quantization types like exl2 maybe a better choice.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/content/en/posts/quantization-llama-cpp/index.md b/content/en/posts/quantization-llama-cpp/index.md
deleted file mode 100644
index bad4c0c..0000000
--- a/content/en/posts/quantization-llama-cpp/index.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
----
-title: Choice a Ideal Quantization Type for llama.cpp
-subtitle:
-date: 2024-03-09T20:59:27-05:00
-slug: quantization-llama-cpp
-draft: true
-author:
-  name: James
-  link: https://www.jamesflare.com
-  email:
-  avatar: /site-logo.avif
-description:
-keywords:
-license:
-comment: true
-weight: 0
-tags:
-  - LLM
-  - Ollama
-  - llama.cpp
-categories:
-  - AI
-hiddenFromHomePage: false
-hiddenFromSearch: false
-hiddenFromRss: false
-hiddenFromRelated: false
-summary:
-resources:
-  - name: featured-image
-    src: featured-image.jpg
-  - name: featured-image-preview
-    src: featured-image-preview.jpg
-toc: true
-math: false
-lightgallery: false
-password:
-message:
-repost:
-  enable: true
-  url:
-
-# See details front matter: https://fixit.lruihao.cn/documentation/content-management/introduction/#front-matter
----
-
-<!--more-->
-
-| Q Type | Size | ppl Change | Note |
-|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
-| Q2\_K\_S | 2.16G | +9.0634 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q2\_K | 2.63G | +0.6717 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q3\_K\_S | 2.75G | +0.5551 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q3\_K | - | - | alias for Q3\_K\_M |
-| Q3\_K\_M | 3.07G | +0.2496 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q3\_K\_L | 3.35G | +0.1764 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q4\_0 | 3.56G | +0.2166 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q4\_K\_S | 3.59G | +0.0992 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q4\_K | - | - | alias for Q4\_K\_M |
-| Q4\_K\_M | 3.80G | +0.0532 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q4\_1 | 3.90G | +0.1585 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q5\_0 | 4.33G | +0.0683 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q5\_K\_S | 4.33G | +0.0400 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q5\_1 | 4.70G | +0.0349 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q5\_K | - | - | alias for Q5\_K\_M |
-| Q5\_K\_M | 4.45G | +0.0122 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q6\_K | 5.15G | +0.0008 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
-| Q8\_0 | 6.70G | +0.0004 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/content/zh-cn/posts/csci-1100/exam-2-overview/index.md b/content/zh-cn/posts/csci-1100/exam-2-overview/index.md
index 9c31f13..660cd0b 100644
--- a/content/zh-cn/posts/csci-1100/exam-2-overview/index.md
+++ b/content/zh-cn/posts/csci-1100/exam-2-overview/index.md
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ comment: true
 weight: 0
 tags:
   - CSCI 1100
-  - 家庭作业
+  - 考试
   - RPI
   - Python
   - 编程
diff --git a/content/zh-cn/posts/llama-cpp/compare-quantization-type/index.md b/content/zh-cn/posts/llama-cpp/compare-quantization-type/index.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ec630be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/zh-cn/posts/llama-cpp/compare-quantization-type/index.md
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+---
+title: 为 llama.cpp 选择理想的量化类型
+subtitle:
+date: 2024-03-15T19:43:54-04:00
+slug: quantization-type-llama-cpp
+draft: false
+author:
+  name: James
+  link: https://www.jamesflare.com
+  email:
+  avatar: /site-logo.avif
+description: 这篇博客文章比较了 llama.cpp 中不同的量化类型，分析了它们对模型大小和困惑度的影响。文章提供了基于质量和性能平衡来选择最佳量化类型的建议。
+keywords: ["llama.cpp", "量化", "对比", "perplexity"]
+license:
+comment: true
+weight: 0
+tags:
+  - 大语言模型
+  - llama.cpp
+  - 量化
+  - Ollama
+categories:
+  - 大语言模型
+collections:
+  - Ollama
+hiddenFromHomePage: false
+hiddenFromSearch: false
+hiddenFromRss: false
+hiddenFromRelated: false
+summary: 这篇博客文章比较了 llama.cpp 中不同的量化类型，分析了它们对模型大小和困惑度的影响。文章提供了基于质量和性能平衡来选择最佳量化类型的建议。
+resources:
+  - name: featured-image
+    src: featured-image.jpg
+  - name: featured-image-preview
+    src: featured-image-preview.jpg
+toc: true
+math: false
+lightgallery: false
+password:
+message:
+repost:
+  enable: true
+  url:
+
+# See details front matter: https://fixit.lruihao.cn/documentation/content-management/introduction/#front-matter
+---
+
+<!--more-->
+
+当我们部署 llama.cpp 或 Ollama 实例时，我们更倾向于运行量化模型以节省内存并加速推理。
+
+但是，量化模型的质量并不总是很好。我们需要选择合适的量化类型来平衡质量和性能。
+
+## llama.cpp 中的量化类型
+
+llama.cpp 中有许多量化类型。当你尝试量化模型时，可以看到以下打印信息。
+
+```text
+Allowed quantization types:
+   2  or  Q4_0    :  3.56G, +0.2166 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   3  or  Q4_1    :  3.90G, +0.1585 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   8  or  Q5_0    :  4.33G, +0.0683 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   9  or  Q5_1    :  4.70G, +0.0349 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  19  or  IQ2_XXS :  2.06 bpw quantization
+  20  or  IQ2_XS  :  2.31 bpw quantization
+  24  or  IQ1_S   :  1.56 bpw quantization
+  10  or  Q2_K    :  2.63G, +0.6717 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  21  or  Q2_K_S  :  2.16G, +9.0634 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  23  or  IQ3_XXS :  3.06 bpw quantization
+  26  or  IQ3_S   :  3.44 bpw quantization
+  27  or  IQ3_M   :  3.66 bpw quantization mix
+  12  or  Q3_K    : alias for Q3_K_M
+  22  or  Q3_K_XS : 3-bit extra small quantization
+  11  or  Q3_K_S  :  2.75G, +0.5551 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  12  or  Q3_K_M  :  3.07G, +0.2496 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  13  or  Q3_K_L  :  3.35G, +0.1764 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  25  or  IQ4_NL  :  4.25 bpw non-linear quantization
+  15  or  Q4_K    : alias for Q4_K_M
+  14  or  Q4_K_S  :  3.59G, +0.0992 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  15  or  Q4_K_M  :  3.80G, +0.0532 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  17  or  Q5_K    : alias for Q5_K_M
+  16  or  Q5_K_S  :  4.33G, +0.0400 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  17  or  Q5_K_M  :  4.45G, +0.0122 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+  18  or  Q6_K    :  5.15G, +0.0008 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   7  or  Q8_0    :  6.70G, +0.0004 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B
+   1  or  F16     : 13.00G              @ 7B
+   0  or  F32     : 26.00G              @ 7B
+          COPY    : only copy tensors, no quantizing
+```
+
+## 量化类型比较
+
+为了帮助我们比较量化类型，我制作了一个表格来显示每种量化类型的大小和 ppl（困惑度）变化。ppl 变化越小意味着质量越好。困惑度通常衡量模型预测结果的置信度。困惑度越低，模型越好。
+
+| Q Type | Size | ppl Change | Note |
+|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| Q2\_K\_S | 2.16G | +9.0634 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q2\_K | 2.63G | +0.6717 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q3\_K\_S | 2.75G | +0.5551 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q3\_K | - | - | alias for Q3\_K\_M |
+| Q3\_K\_M | 3.07G | +0.2496 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q3\_K\_L | 3.35G | +0.1764 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q4\_0 | 3.56G | +0.2166 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q4\_K\_S | 3.59G | +0.0992 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q4\_K | - | - | alias for Q4\_K\_M |
+| Q4\_K\_M | 3.80G | +0.0532 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q4\_1 | 3.90G | +0.1585 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q5\_0 | 4.33G | +0.0683 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q5\_K\_S | 4.33G | +0.0400 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q5\_1 | 4.70G | +0.0349 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q5\_K | - | - | alias for Q5\_K\_M |
+| Q5\_K\_M | 4.45G | +0.0122 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q6\_K | 5.15G | +0.0008 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+| Q8\_0 | 6.70G | +0.0004 | @ LLaMA-v1-7B |
+
+为了帮助我们理解大小和 ppl 变化之间的关系，我制作了一个散点图来显示这种关系。
+
+{{< echarts >}}
+{
+  "title": {
+    "text": "ppl 变化 vs 大小",
+    "top": "2%",
+    "left": "center"
+  },
+  "xAxis": {
+    "name": "大小 (GB)",
+    "nameLocation": "middle",
+    "nameGap": 30
+  },
+  "yAxis": {
+    "name": "ppl 变化",
+    "nameLocation": "middle",
+    "nameGap": 40
+  },
+  "series": [
+    {
+      "symbolSize": 10,
+      "data": [
+        {
+          "name": "Q2_K",
+          "value": [2.63, 0.6717]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q3_K_S",
+          "value": [2.75, 0.5551]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q3_K_M",
+          "value": [3.07, 0.2496]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q3_K_L",
+          "value": [3.35, 0.1764]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q4_0",
+          "value": [3.56, 0.2166]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q4_K_S",
+          "value": [3.59, 0.0992]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q4_K_M",
+          "value": [3.80, 0.0532]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q4_1",
+          "value": [3.90, 0.1585]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q5_0",
+          "value": [4.33, 0.0683]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q5_K_S",
+          "value": [4.33, 0.0400]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q5_1",
+          "value": [4.70, 0.0349]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q5_K_M",
+          "value": [4.45, 0.0122]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q6_K",
+          "value": [5.15, 0.0008]
+        },
+        {
+          "name": "Q8_0",
+          "value": [6.70, 0.0004]
+        }
+      ],
+      "type": "scatter"
+    }
+  ],
+  "tooltip": {
+    "trigger": "item",
+    "formatter": "Q Type: {b}<br/>Data: {c}"
+  }
+}
+{{< /echarts >}}
+
+## 总结
+
+从表格和散点图中，我们可以看出 Q8\_0 质量最好，但大小也最大。Q2\_K\_S 质量最差，但大小最小。Q4\_K\_M 在质量和大小之间取得了最佳平衡。但我推荐 Q5\_K\_M，它具有良好的质量和合理的大小。
+
+对于小模型，如 7B、14B，我推荐 Q6\_K，即使它比 Q5\_K\_M 大，但 ppl 变化非常小。对于像 RTX 4090 这样的 GPU，24GB 显存绰绰有余。但对于 GPU，其他量化类型如 exl2 可能是更好的选择。
\ No newline at end of file