From 0ca8059034f365438494855c48050c7f1f37e3af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jidong Xiao Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:16:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] adjusting rubrics --- hws/05_online_dating/README.md | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hws/05_online_dating/README.md b/hws/05_online_dating/README.md index 324716d..aee10cb 100644 --- a/hws/05_online_dating/README.md +++ b/hws/05_online_dating/README.md @@ -155,8 +155,7 @@ In this assignment, you are required to create linked lists, **but you are not a Use good coding style when you design and implement your program. Organize your program into functions: don’t put all the code in main! Be sure to read the [Homework Policies](https://www.cs.rpi.edu/academics/courses/fall23/csci1200/homework_policies.php) as you put the finishing touches on your solution. Be sure to make up new test cases to fully debug your program and don’t forget to comment your code! Use the provided template [README.txt](./README.txt) file for notes you want the grader to read. -You must do this assignment on your own, as described in the [Collaboration Policy & Academic Integrity](https://www.cs.rpi.edu/academics/courses/fall23/csci1200/academic_integrity.php) page. If you did discuss the problem or error messages, etc. with anyone, please list their names in your -README.txt file. +You must do this assignment on your own, as described in the [Collaboration Policy & Academic Integrity](https://www.cs.rpi.edu/academics/courses/fall23/csci1200/academic_integrity.php) page. If you did discuss the problem or error messages, etc. with anyone, please list their names in your README.txt file. **Due Date**: 10/12/2023, Thursday, 23:59pm. @@ -166,8 +165,8 @@ README.txt file. - README.txt Completed (2 pts) - One of name, collaborators, or hours not filled in. (-1) - Two or more of name, collaborators, or hours not filled in. (-2) - - OVERALL CLASS DECLARATION & IMPLEMENTATION AND CODING STYLE (Good class design, split into a .h and .cpp file. Functions > 1 line are in .cpp file. Organized class implementation and reasonable comments throughout. Correct use of const/const& and of class method const. ) (7 pts) - - No credit (significantly incomplete implementation) (-7) + - OVERALL CLASS DECLARATION & IMPLEMENTATION AND CODING STYLE (Good class design, split into a .h and .cpp file. Functions > 1 line are in .cpp file. Organized class implementation and reasonable comments throughout. Correct use of const/const& and of class method const. ) (6 pts) + - No credit (significantly incomplete implementation) (-6) - Function bodies containing more than one statement are placed in the .h file. (-2) - Missing include guards in the .h file. (Or does not declare them correctly) (-1) - Functions are not well documented or are poorly commented, in either the .h or the .cpp file. (-1)